If you, dear reader, disagrees with the PCP-SL then "Hate the class, its vanguard and leadership" is a scoundrel representative of "old revisionism." You nor anyone else has the right to disagree with the PCP-SL or to make public his criticism of the "unfading" Gonzalo Thought. According to the logic of Gonzales, the only Communists are in the PCP-SL. All the leftists, socialists, communists and libertarians who do not militate in the PCP-SL is spawn of the reaction, of imperialism, bureaucratic and comprador bourgeoisie. To tell them, the owners of the universal truth "unfading," are worse than imperialism and the big bourgeoisie, because they are bearers of bourgeois and reactionary ideas in the classroom, in the village, among the masses. If we are worse than the imperialists, then it would be nice to eliminate us physically. Why not surprise that some unhappy reach such conclusions? Did not have before?
violence bigots APRA has cultivated a very similar path of intolerance. When polemizábamos with APRA, the controversy stemmed from the exchange of ideas opposed to the insults, the ideological differences to the provocations, provocations to shock. It was not unusual to see a fellow left with a broken head or multiple bruises after being lynched by a mob of buffalo. APRA and its martyrs, APRA and heritage of universal truth, APRA and its leader were unquestionable, indisputable, untouchable. Any disagreement was an offense. Those who cultivated the tradition of "beating the radish" then formed the Commando Rodrigo Franco and changed the theme to a more pragmatic: "kill the radishes." His victims are all leftist parties. The PCP-SL had no allies, not faced with any other political force, as he did Comrade Mao Tse Tung. As he did Ho Chi Minh. As he did Marx and the great Lenin. Strategic defeat of the PCP-SL was due, among other factors, to a conception no Marxist front. There was no front, as recommended Dimitrov and Mao. There were transmission belts of the party, which is not the same. Who was not with the PCP-SL was against the PCP-SL. Their self is much like the slogan of the APRA SEASAP: Only save Peru APRA.
Revisionists, class and snitches
In any armed struggle, the state terror are answered with the authority of the revolution. Simply put, every revolution eliminates informers, infiltrators and traitors. No one can make from the left a crusade for the rights of a whistleblower or informer. But not always the PCP-SL removed informers or infiltrators, but so did with those from other stores on the left disagreed ideologically and methodologically. It seems that many local commanders took to heart the slogan of Gonzalo "wiped off the face of the earth to revisionism." illustrated
The petty bourgeoisie can not replace the proletariat and to organize on their behalf and under the symbol of the Communist Party. The radicalized petty bourgeoisie and organized Communist Party, without the proletariat in charge, tends to be so intolerant and totalitarian as the petty bourgeoisie organized fascist parties such as APRA. "Annihilate the radish" for some is the same as "liquidating revisionist" for others. And is that the petty bourgeoisie is intolerant for structural reasons. Tends to authoritarianism or on behalf of the most advanced ideas (Pol Pot) or on behalf of the most reactionary ideas (fascism).
and see how it responds the story: Gonzalo fell not because of any "revisionist" IU or MIR or MRTA. Fell betrayal of PCP-SL militants who had access to the inner circle with the leadership. As we mentioned before, this is the only armed struggle was suspended because he has fallen prey to his boss. And Feliciano, one of the highest-ranking cadres in the PCP-SL, captured by the reaction, offered to betray guerrilla camps, arsenals and depots of explosives. If this was an address box, with a long history, in trust for his leadership, it means you have the "right ideology" (MLM-PG) does not solve everything.
The proletariat seeks to build a vanguard
lie No more. No self-deception. If anything, the proletariat today is no direction, cutting-edge match. Proclaim the direction of the class is cynical, because at present the majority of the proletariat is contracted condition, without levels of organization, without political orientation who struggles demands. The PCP-SL remains fragmented and tends to further fragmentation yet, but something that is evident and clear is that the PCP-SL (any version) is not at the head of the proletariat or the people who continue to fight.
When the Marxist-Leninist polemics with Gonzales, we are not attacking the working class, or his party or his art. Do not be proud. Occupy a modest place in the ranks of fighting people today struggle against the mining, against neoliberalism and against impunity for genocide. We must work to forge the subjective conditions and a revolutionary class-struggle leadership.
The controversy should be
What is the role of controversy started Ibarra's book? ... I understand that we rebuild the lost space all left in Peru: the electoral and navy, in all its names and forms. To recover that space should amend the mistakes of the past, widespread criticism and self-criticism in the face of the masses, straighten the road and continue until final victory over imperialism and the bourgeoisie. Who is controversial abortion are appropriate today, is because he is afraid to face the truth and so resorts to insult, the personal disqualification, pitting those who can easily fall into the verbal and then physical violence. But those arguments do not run to the Marxists. Nobody here recede for fear of insult or threat, because until the dictatorship fujimontesinista has failed in that attempt. ............ ......... .......... ... FIN ... ......... ......... ......... ......... .
PD .- A bigot wrote:
"References to Mr. Dante Castro has become more outrageous that Mr. Ibarra. Briefly point out that this old leftist like the Red Patria Brown have distinguished themselves for dealing with the struggles of the people and now intend to do so at the expense of PCP. After his "academic left" seeks to present himself as the Robin Hood of Peruvian politics to thrive in the struggles and aspirations and popular university. This subject has as teachers to Bernales Ballesteros, Dammert, Brena Pantoja, etc., His teachers say it in their placid meetings of coffee. "
And pretend to answer. This guy (me) says no she was a teacher to Dammert or Brena Pantoja (what can be taught?), but Enrique Bernales Ballesteros in the course of constitutional law, an area in which the teacher is competent, (it is not in politics). Following his reasoning, Comrade Gonzalo teacher was to Saturnino Paredes (PCP-BR), who inherited many objectionable habits as absolutism, but before it was militant (as Saturnino) of a PCP led by Jorge del Prado. Does that makes him pro-Soviet revisionist? This old leftist (I) replied that he has not "trafficked" to the struggles of the people, for he has obtained nothing in return for their participation. In the same vein I also reject the word "thrive" in good Castilian is "to improve their fortunes, profit." What fortune? Where is the profit I've earned? This is achieved in return is just the opposite: a string of disappointments. The class enemy is timely to make us pay for our sins in confinement, in exile, torture, persecution. Not only the PCP-SL has martyrs, prisoners, persecuted or exiled. Not only the PCP-SL has disappeared, killed or extrajudicial execution. This controversy is a political content, is the exchange of ideas, concepts opposition and ideological lines. It is not subjectivity. I will not argue about whether Gonzalo danced Zorba the Greek or Winston Light cigarette smoking or listening to Frank Sinatra "in its quiet coffee meetings." All that is irrelevant. All these are subtleties and nonsense. Comrade Gonzalo, as the PCP-SL controls that are in prison, would be better debaters than you, because they have better level and have played, in its own way to the classics of scientific socialism. At least never would write a note so bestial as it misspelled and drafting errors. I assure you that personal qualifying and would save the heart of the controversy.
I will refrain from answering falsehoods with falsehoods and insults with insults. That is not my field. Without further ado: Dante Castro
0 comments:
Post a Comment